MetaCost
Contributor I
Hi,
I would like to use OptimizeParameters in conjunction with MetaCost. I would like to iterate through Type II error costs between 1 and 10, and determine the best trade-off between Type I and II errors. I saw another post that said you could define a Macro, which I did, and called it CostVal. Then in the OptimizeParameters, I set the value of the macro CostVal. Then in the MetaCost matrix, I tried to specify the cost using %{CostVal}. However the tool would now allow that macro to be set. It changed the cost back to a number. It did the same thing when I tried to change the process XML file. Is there a solution to this?
Bev
I would like to use OptimizeParameters in conjunction with MetaCost. I would like to iterate through Type II error costs between 1 and 10, and determine the best trade-off between Type I and II errors. I saw another post that said you could define a Macro, which I did, and called it CostVal. Then in the OptimizeParameters, I set the value of the macro CostVal. Then in the MetaCost matrix, I tried to specify the cost using %{CostVal}. However the tool would now allow that macro to be set. It changed the cost back to a number. It did the same thing when I tried to change the process XML file. Is there a solution to this?
Bev
1
