"Macro in report name doesn't work - bug or missing feature?"
ImageMiner
MemberPosts:4Contributor I
Hi,
I have a process loop over some values. Now I would like to generate one report for each iteration.
Observation 1:
As expected, if I use a static name for the "Create Report" and the "Report" operators, only parts of the last iteration are inside the report file.
Observation 2:
I decided to generate the report file with postfix %{loop_value}, but I have to split the report parts too.
So I used the macro name %{loop_value} inside the "Create Report" operator. Now no report is generated at all .
My question: Is it possible to use a macro inside the "Create Report" operator as report name?
并进一步更多…是其他e an operator, which finalizes the report, so one can reuse the static name?
Is it a bug or a feature
One simple example as xml below.
Regards
Ralf
I have a process loop over some values. Now I would like to generate one report for each iteration.
Observation 1:
As expected, if I use a static name for the "Create Report" and the "Report" operators, only parts of the last iteration are inside the report file.
Observation 2:
I decided to generate the report file with postfix %{loop_value}, but I have to split the report parts too.
So I used the macro name %{loop_value} inside the "Create Report" operator. Now no report is generated at all .
My question: Is it possible to use a macro inside the "Create Report" operator as report name?
并进一步更多…是其他e an operator, which finalizes the report, so one can reuse the static name?
Is it a bug or a feature
One simple example as xml below.
Regards
Ralf
<参数键= value =“pie_3d_absolute_values歧视se"/>
Tagged:
0
Answers
it's a missing buggy featureNo, to be serious, all report streams are closed automatically when the process is finished. We did not thought that it would be useful to split the report in this way, as we assumed that new sections would be favorable.
Each time the report operator is executed, it will append something to the reporting "stream". So there should not be missing anything if you execute it in a loop...
Well I just took a look into that. Yes, it's indeed a buggy feature, only static names are supported right now.
Greetings,
Sebastian